Quezon City Rep. Bong Suntay’s recent inappropriate remarks about actress Anne Curtis are yet another example of how women are often not seen as people. During a House committee on justice hearing, he argued that Vice President Sara Duterte’s threat against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. cannot be made an impeachable offense. To illustrate his argument, Suntay then drew an “analogy” involving his own sexual fantasies toward the actress upon seeing her in person, insisting that since such thoughts exist only in his imagination, he cannot be charged for them. Following this, while some celebrities, netizens, and politicians condemned Suntay’s behavior, others came to his defense. For example, controversial lawyer Ferdinand Topacio, who once proclaimed his admiration for fascist dictator Adolf Hitler, defended the congressman during his radio program. In defense of Suntay’s backlash, Topacio lashed out at Jasmine Curtis and Gabriela Women’s Party Rep. Sarah Elago for defending Anne Curtis, blaming the women for “enticing” with the way they dress online. Topacio rationalized his remarks with the notion that men are “wired” to have sexual desires, while confessing his desire to Elago.

Here’s the thing: one of the biggest problems with many lawmakers is their lack of understanding of the very laws they are meant to uphold. Too often, they make questionable statements with absolute confidence, while those around them laugh it off as if it’s just another ordinary day. We see them commit heinous acts and walk away with little more than a slap on the wrist. If a so-called ‘honorable’ congressman believes such remarks are acceptable in the halls of Congress, one can only imagine the private conversations that occur when women are not present. It is deeply troubling that we are expected to address these officials as ‘honorable,’ a title that should be reserved for those who act with genuine integrity and respect, not for those who behave disrespectfully, dishonestly, or abusively.

Both Bong Suntay’s and Ferdinand Topacio’s statements should not be mistaken as ‘compliments’ or harmless admiration. Rather, they reinforce evidence of gender-based sexual harassment as defined under RA No. 11313, also known as the Safe Spaces Act (Bawal Bastos Law), or RA No. 9710, also known as the Magna Carta of Women, or RA No. 6713, otherwise known as the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. 

Public figures who do not hold themselves accountable exemplify how those in positions of power often embody authoritarian politics that fuel the current rise of fascism. While it is true that society has made significant progress in fighting for women’s rights and welfare, there is still a need to deconstruct the systemic levels of misogyny that exclude women, label them as inferior, silence their voices, and even persuade them to defend the very system that oppresses them. 

Their statements are violations not just against Anne Curtis but against all women who have felt threatened or unsafe by the reckless language of those in power. As we celebrate National Women’s Month, let us remember that a woman’s dignity is not defined by men’s desires or by callous remarks. It is a fundamental human right that must never be trampled upon, especially by lawmakers entrusted with upholding justice.

For the Philippines, the crisis is not distant. Millions of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) live and work across the Middle East, making their safety and welfare a paramount concern. At the same time, the Philippine economy remains highly exposed to disruptions in oil supply and shipping routes from the region. As the current Chair of ASEAN, the Philippines also carries an important responsibility to help articulate a principled regional voice in moments of international crisis.

In light of these realities, PCID respectfully recommends the following actions by the Philippine government:

1) Prioritize the protection of Filipinos in the Middle East – The government should strengthen crisis coordination among the Department of Foreign Affairs, Department of Migrant Workers, and other relevant agencies to ensure the safety and welfare of OFWs. This includes intensified monitoring of the security situation, expanded consular assistance, and clear communication channels with Filipino communities in affected countries.

2) Prepare contingency plans for voluntary repatriation if conditions deteriorate – Government agencies should ensure readiness for possible repatriation operations, including logistical planning for transport, temporary accommodation, and reintegration assistance for returning workers.

3) Mitigate potential energy and economic shocks – Given the Philippines’ dependence on oil imports from the Middle East, the government should activate measures to manage potential supply disruptions and price volatility, including close monitoring of energy markets, supply diversification where possible, and policies to cushion vulnerable sectors from sudden increases in fuel prices.

4) Maintain a consistent diplomatic position calling for restraint and de-escalation – The Philippines should continue to emphasize the importance of diplomacy, respect for international law, and the protection of civilian populations in all statements concerning the conflict.

5) Issue a Statement the Philippines Could Advance as Chair of ASEAN – In its capacity as Chair of ASEAN, the Philippines could encourage the Association to issue a collective statement that:

• Calls for the immediate cessation of bombing and military escalation by all parties;
• Urges maximum restraint to prevent the conflict from widening across the region; Appeals for an urgent return to negotiations and diplomatic engagement through the
• United Nations and other multilateral mechanisms; and
• Reaffirms ASEAN’s longstanding commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes and the protection of civilian populations.

At moments such as this, responsible leadership requires both prudence and clarity. Protecting citizens, safeguarding economic stability, and advocating for diplomacy over escalation must remain the guiding priorities of the Philippines and the wider international community.###

February 22, 2026 – Long before the modern borders of the Philippines were etched in stone, a young man named Abd ul-Bagui Butu Rasul walked the shores of Jolo, carrying a lineage that stretched back to the 14th-century ministers of Raja Baginda. Born in 1865, the man who would become known as Hadji Butu was destined for more than just local prominence. By the age of sixteen, his sharp intellect and deep Islamic education propelled him to the role of Chief Minister to the Sultan of Sulu. He was a master of the “long game,” navigating the treacherous waters of a sultanate torn between internal power struggles and the encroaching shadow of Spanish colonial rule.

As powers shifted from Spanish to American rules, Hadji Butu remained a constant, grounding force. He was a diplomat who understood that while military government was obeyed through fear, civil government is obeyed through love. Whether he was negotiating the Kiram-Bates Treaty or serving as an assistant to legendary figures like General Leonard Wood and John Pershing – the one appointed him as the Deputy District Governor of Sulu in 1913. His goal was simple: to preserve the dignity of the Moro people while weaving their destiny into the broader fabric of a rising Philippine nation.

In 1916, Hadji Butu became the first Muslim Filipino to sit in the Philippine Senate. He wasn’t just a symbolic figurehead. He was a visionary, who originally advocated for the creation of the Philippine Military Academy (PMA) and the Naval Academy, believing that a nation’s strength lay in its ability to defend itself. He stood side by side with his Christian brothers in the fight for independence, famously declaring that they were all bound by a common tie and a shared ideal for the welfare of the Philippines. His voice was one of the few that bridged the deep cultural divides of the archipelago, proving that faith and Philippine identity could walk hand in hand.

Even in his final years, his mind remained dedicated to the soul of the country. In 1937, President Manuel Quezon appointed him to the Institute of National Language to help define a unified tongue for the diverse people of the Philippines. When Hadji Butu passed away on February 22, 1937, he left behind a legacy that was much more than a list of titles. He was a noble man, a historian, a peacebuilder, and a real patriot who spent many years proving that the heart of the South beat in perfect rhythm with the Philippines as a whole.